WILLIAMS v. DOE, ET AL., No. 2:2016cv03949 - Document 15 (E.D. Pa. 2017)
Court Description: OPINION/ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AS TO DEFENDANT KORSZNIAK IS GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 10/17/17. 10/18/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND MAILED TO PRO SE'.(ky, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
WILLIAMS v. DOE, ET AL. Doc. 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROGER WILLIAMS, Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-3949 NURSE/DOCTOR JOHN DOE/ JANE DOE, et al., Defendants ORDER AND NOW, this 17th day of October, 2017, upon review of Defendants Motion to Dismiss, and all supporting papers, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF Docket No. 8) as to Defendant Korszniak is GRANTED with prejudice. 2. Plaintiff shall be given thirty (30) days to file an amended complaint properly identifying Jane/John Doe Defendants. Failure to do so will result in complete dismissal without further notice. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
