VAN DE KAMP et al v. TRANSDERMAL SPECIALTIES, INC. et al, No. 2:2016cv02768 - Document 106 (E.D. Pa. 2018)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO EXCLUDE LAY OPINION TESTIMONY BY BRUCE REDDING IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OULTINED HEREIN. ON OR BEFORE 12/28/2018 MR. REDDING WILL SUPPLY AN AFFIDAVIT DETAILING THE EVIDENCE, REASONING AND CONCLUSION FOR ANY LAY OPINIONS HE INTENDS TO PROFFER AT TRIAL IN SUPPORT OF HIS DAMAGE THEORIES. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD A. LLORET ON 12/17/2018. 12/17/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SES AND E-MAILED.(amas)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA THEODORE J. VAN DE KAMP, et al. Plaintiffs, v. TRANSDERMAL SPECIALTIES, INC., et al. Defendants. : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-cv-02768 ORDER For the reasons explained in my Memorandum Opinion filed with this Order, it is on this 17th day of December, 2018, ORDERED That Plaintiffs’ motion to exclude lay opinion testimony by Bruce Redding is GRANTED, as to lost future profits. Any exhibits introduced to support Mr. Redding’s lay opinion testimony also are excluded. To the extent Plaintiffs’ motion seeks exclusion of other types of lay opinion evidence, it is DENIED, with leave to renew before trial by motion in limine. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that on or before December 28, 2018 Mr. Redding will supply an affidavit detailing the evidence, reasoning and conclusion for any lay opinions he intends to proffer at trial in support of his damage theories. The Clerk will ensure this Order is mailed and emailed to Mr. Redding. BY THE COURT: s/Richard A. Lloret _______ RICHARD A. LLORET U.S. Magistrate Judge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
