FULLERTON v. POTTSTOWN HOSPITAL CORPORATION et al, No. 2:2015cv05329 - Document 33 (E.D. Pa. 2016)
Court Description: ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART FOR THE REASONS DISCUSSED IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION. ETC.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE TIMOTHY R. RICE ON 7/13/2016. 7/13/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
FULLERTON v. POTTSTOWN HOSPITAL CORPORATION et al Doc. 33 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SARAH FULLERTON, Plaintiff, v. POTTSTOWN HOSPITAL CORPORATION, et al. Defendants. : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 15-5329 ORDER AND NOW, on July 13, 2016, upon consideration of Defendant Pottstown Hospital Corporation’s motion for summary judgment (doc. 29), Plaintiff Sarah Fullerton’s response (doc. 30), and Pottstown’s reply (doc. 31), it is ORDERED that Defendant’s motion is granted in part and denied in part for the reasons discussed in the accompanying memorandum opinion. Plaintiff’s claim of interference in violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. (“FMLA”), based on her supervisor’s alleged telephone calls to her while she was on FMLA leave is dismissed. Defendant’s motion is denied as to Plaintiff’s other claims. BY THE COURT: /s/ Timothy R. Rice TIMOTHY R. RICE United States Magistrate Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
