WRIGHT v. WETZEL et al, No. 2:2015cv05109 - Document 19 (E.D. Pa. 2016)
Court Description: OPINION/ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS, ECF NOS. 10, 13 ARE GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; AND THIS CASE IS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 7/7/16. 7/8/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE' AND E-MAILED. (ky, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
WRIGHT v. WETZEL et al Doc. 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA __________________________________________ ANDRE WRIGHT, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : JOHN WETZEL; : 1 MICHAEL WENEROWICZ; A.B. MATHIS; : MARY CANINO; : PROGRAM REVIEW COMMITTEE AT SCIG; : ROBIN M. LEWIS; JANE/JOHN DOES, : : Defendants. : __________________________________________ No. 5:15-cv-05109 ORDER AND NOW, this 7th day of July, 2016, upon consideration Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss, ECF Nos. 10, 13, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum issued this date, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Defendants’ Motions, ECF Nos. 10, 13, are GRANTED; 2. Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice; 3. This case is CLOSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Joseph F. Leeson, Jr.__________ JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. United States District Judge 1 The docket incorrectly identifies Michael Wenereowicz and the Superintendent of the State Correctional Institution at Graterford as two separate defendants. 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
