MARTIN v. GLUNT et al, No. 2:2015cv03394 - Document 25 (E.D. Pa. 2018)
Court Description: OPINION/ORDER THAT ALL OF PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ARE OVERRULED AND DENIED. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; MOTION NOS. 3 AND 11 ARE DENIED, AND THE CASE IS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 4/3/18. 4/4/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE' AND E-MAILED. (ky, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
MARTIN v. GLUNT et al Doc. 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ____________________________________ DESMOND MARTIN, Petitioner, : : : v. : : STEPHEN GLUNT; : THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE : COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA; and : THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE : STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, : Respondents. : ____________________________________ No. 2:15-cv-3394 ORDER AND NOW, this 3rd day of April, 2018, for the reasons set forth in the Opinion issued this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. All of Petitioner’s objections, ECF No. 23, to the Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED and DENIED; 2. The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 20, is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 4. The Motion to Stay, ECF No. 3, is DENIED; 5. The Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing, ECF No. 11, is DENIED; 6. This case is CLOSED; and 7. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. BY THE COURT: /s/ Joseph F. Leeson, Jr.__________ JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. United States District Judge 040318 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
