KUBIS v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUCKS et al, No. 2:2015cv02142 - Document 57 (E.D. Pa. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 49 ) IS DISMISSED. A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 7/29/20. 7/31/20 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE; E-MAILED.(amas, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
KUBIS v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUCKS et al Doc. 57 Case 2:15-cv-02142-WB Document 57 Filed 07/30/20 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GEORGE VINCENT KUBIS, Petitioner, v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BUCKS COUNTY, et al., Respondents. : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION 15-CV-2142 ORDER AND NOW, this 29th day of July, 2020, in consideration of Petitioner George Vincent Kubis’s Motion for Relief from Judgment Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) (ECF No. 49), it is ORDERED that: 1. The Motion is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction for the reasons set forth in the Court’s Memorandum accompanying this Order. 2. A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) because reasonable jurists would not debate the propriety of this Court’s procedural ruling with respect to these claims. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). BY THE COURT: /s/Wendy Beetlestone, J. ___________________________________ WENDY BEETLESTONE, J. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
