REYES v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY et al, No. 2:2013cv04379 - Document 48 (E.D. Pa. 2016)
Court Description: OPINION/ORDER THAT THE MOTIONS OF DEFENDANTS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (NOS. 40 AND 41) ARE DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 11/1/16. 11/2/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ky, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
REYES v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY et al Doc. 48 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MARIA REYES, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-4379 OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, DAYMARK REALTY ADVISORS, INC., and NNN 1818 MARKET STREET, LLC, Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 1st day of November, 2016, upon consideration of the two separate defense motion for summary judgment as well the motion to preclude Plaintiff’s liability expert, and all supporting and opposing papers, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The Motion of Defendants Daymark Realty Advisors, Inc., and NNN 1818 Market Street, LLC, for Summary Judgment and to Preclude Plaintiff’s Liability Expert (Doc. #40) is DENIED in both respects. 2. The Motion of Defendant Otis Elevator Company for Summary Judgment (Doc. #41) is DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
