LEAMAN v. WOLFE, No. 2:2013cv00975 - Document 85 (E.D. Pa. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER THAT FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION, PLFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 75) IS GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART & DEFT GREGG B. WOLFE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 76) IS DENIED, ETC. JUDGMENT SHALL BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLFF & AGAINST DEFT IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $38,873.32. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JOY FLOWERS CONTI ON 2/9/17. 2/9/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
LEAMAN v. WOLFE Doc. 85 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JANICE M. LEAMAN, Plaintiff, v. GREGG B. WOLFE, Defendant. ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-CV-00975 ) United States District Court for the ) Eastern District of Pennsylvania ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER OF COURT AND NOW this 9th day of February, 2017, upon consideration of the parties' crossmotions for summary judgment after remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum opinion, plaintiff Janice M. Leaman's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 75) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART and defendant Gregg B. Wolfe's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 76) is DENIED. Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages of $10,523.97 for interest and reasonable attorneys' fees of $28,349.35. Judgment shall be entered in favor of plaintiff Janice M. Leaman and against defendant Gregg B. Wolfe in the total amount of $38,873.32. BY THE COURT: Isl Joy Flowers Conti Joy Flowers Conti Chief Judge, U.S. District Court 18 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
