ACKOUREY v. SONELLAS CUSTOM TAILORS et al

Filing 14

ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION OVER DEFENDANTS. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THE CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 8/21/2013. 8/22/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RICHARD C. ACKOUREY d/b/a GRAPHIC STYLES/STYLES INTERNATIONAL LLC, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 12-6729 SONELLAS CUSTOM TAILORS, a/k/a HONG KONG TAILORS (USA), and DILEEP KUMAR DASWANI, a/k/a KEN DASWANI, Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 21st day of August, 2013, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) (Doc. No. 10, filed April 29, 2013), Plaintiff’s Memorandum In Opposition To Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss Based On Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction Pursuant To Rule 12(b)(2) (Doc. No. 11, filed May 13, 2013), and Reply Brief In Support Of Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss Based On Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction Pursuant To Rule 12(b)(2) (Doc. No. 12, filed May 20, 2013), for the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum dated August 21, 2013, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) is GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of personal jurisdiction over defendants. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall MARK the case CLOSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Hon. Jan E. DuBois DuBOIS, JAN E., J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?