TELFORD BOROUGH AUTHORITY v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al, No. 2:2012cv06548 - Document 164 (E.D. Pa. 2021)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOC. NO. 156 ) IS GRANTED. PARAGRAPHS 12.C, 12.D, 267, 287 THROUGH 290, 368, 387 THROUGH 389, AND 392 THROUGH 398, AND COUNTS IX AND X ARE STRICKEN FROM THE AMENDED COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE A. SITARSKI ON 2/4/21. 2/4/21 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO COUNSEL; E-MAILED.(amas, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
TELFORD BOROUGH AUTHORITY v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al Doc. 164 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TELFORD BOROUGH AUTHORITY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No.: 12-CV-6548 ORDER AND NOW, this 4TH day of February, 2021, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 156), and Plaintiff’s Response and Supplemental Response in Opposition thereto (ECF Nos. 157; 158-1), and for the reasons set forth in the memorandum filed concurrently with this Order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED. Paragraphs 12.c, 12.d, 267, 287 through 290, 368, 387 through 389, and 392 through 398, and Counts IX and X are STRICKEN from the Amended Complaint. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lynne A. Sitarski LYNNE A. SITARSKI United States Magistrate Judge . Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
