GORDIAN MEDICAL, INC. v. GENTELL, INC. et al
Filing
58
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION THAT THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS' AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM (DOC. NOS. 47 AND 48) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 8/21/2013. 8/21/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED (kk, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
GORDIAN MEDICAL, INC. d/b/a
AMERICAN MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES
:
:
:
:
vs.
:
:
GENTELL, INC., WOUNDED CARE
:
CONCEPTS INC., FREDRIC A. BROTZ,
:
DAVID NAVAZIO,
:
KATHLEEN E. KENNEDY,
:
ELIZABETH J. MEYERS,
:
JOELLEN FISCHER, and PEGGY J. BATES :
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 12-5582
ORDER
AND NOW, this 21st day of August, 2013, upon consideration of plaintiff’s motion to
dismiss defendants’ amended counterclaim (Dkt. Nos. 47 and 48), defendants’ response thereto
(Dkt. Nos. 50, 51 and 53) and plaintiff’s reply briefs (Dkt. Nos. 52 and 54), and consistent with
the accompanying Memorandum of Law, it is ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED to the extent that defendants’ amended
counterclaim asserts factual allegations under a claim for wrongful use of
civil proceedings.
2.
Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED to the extent that defendants’ amended
counterclaim asserts factual allegations under a common law abuse of
process claim.
s/Thomas N. O’Neill, Jr.
THOMAS N. O’NEILL, JR., J.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
