THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY v. URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC. et al
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT HANOVERS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON PLEADINGS IS GRANTED AS OUTLINED HEREIN. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY AND AGAINST URBAN OUTFITTERS.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 8/19/13. 8/19/13 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
_____________________________________
THE HANOVER INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
v.
URBAN OUTFITTERS et al.
Defendants
_____________________________________
URBAN OUTFITTERS et al.
Third-Party Plaintiffs
v.
ONEBEACON AMERICA INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Third-Party Defendant
_____________________________________
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 12-cv-3961
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
ORDER
AND NOW this 19th of August 2013, upon consideration of plaintiff The Hanover
Insurance Company’s motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. No. 26), defendant and thirdparty plaintiff Urban Outfitters’s response (Dkt. No. 29), third-party defendant One Beacon
America Insurance Company’s response (Dkt. No. 30), Hanover’s reply brief (Dkt. No. 32), and
Urban Outfitters’s surreply (Dkt. No. 33), it is ORDERED that Hanover’s motion is GRANTED.
Hanover has no potential duty to indemnify, and therefore, no duty to defend the Urban
Outfitters defendants in connection with the underlying suit brought by the Navajo Nation in the
United States District Court for the District of New Mexico (No. 12-195). JUDGMENT is
entered in favor of the Hanover Insurance Company and against Urban Outfitters.
__ s/Thomas N. O’Neill, Jr____
THOMAS N. O’NEILL, JR., J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?