P.V. et al v. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA et al
Filing
24
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFFS CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STRIKE CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS IS DENIED. DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LEGROME D. DAVIS ON 10/31/11. 10/31/11 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
P.V., a minor, by and through his Parents,
Pedro Valentin and Yolanda Cruz,
individually, and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
The School District of Philadelphia, et al.
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 2:11-cv-04027
ORDER
AND NOW, this 31st day of October, 2011, upon consideration of (1) Defendants’ Motion
to Dismiss (Doc. No. 11), (2) Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants’
Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 17), (3) Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File a Reply Brief in
Support of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint (Doc. No. 21), (4) Reply Brief in
Support of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 21-1), (5) Motion by Defendants to Strike
Class Action Allegations (Doc. No. 12), (6) Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Motion to Strike
Class Action Allegations (Doc. No. 18), (7) Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File a Reply Brief in
Support of Defendants’ Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Class Action Allegations (Doc. No. 22), and
(8) Reply Brief in Support of Defendants’ Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Class Action Allegations
(Doc. No. 22-2), and in accordance with the reasoning set forth in the accompanying
Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1
1.
Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File a Reply Brief in Support of Defendants’
Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint (Doc. No. 21) is GRANTED. The Clerk
of Court is directed to enter Doc. No. 21-1 as “Reply Brief in Support of
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.”
2.
Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File a Reply Brief in Support of Defendants’
Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Class Action Allegations (Doc. No. 22) is GRANTED.
The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Doc. No. 22-2 as “Reply Brief in Support of
Defendants’ Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Class Action Allegations.”
3.
Defendants’ Motion to Strike Class Action Allegations (Doc. No. 12) is DENIED.
4.
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 11) is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Legrome D. Davis
Legrome D. Davis, J.
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
