BLACKSHEAR v. VERIZON, DE LLC et al
Filing
10
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT VERIZON DELAWARE, LLC'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS GRANTED AND THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO PLAINTIFF FILING AN AMENDED COMPLAINT THAT ALLEGES FACTS SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT ALL OF THE EL EMENTS OF A CLAIM FOR EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION BROUGHT PURSUANT TO TITLE VII. IF PLAINTIFF FAILS TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT BY 11/28/11, THIS ACTION WILL BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 10/27/11. 10/28/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREP AND E-MAILED.(mbh, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
TIMOTHY J. BLACKSHEAR
v.
VERIZON, DE, LLC
:
:
:
:
:
ORDER
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 11-1036
AND NOW, this 27th day of October, 2011, upon consideration of “Defendant Verizon
Delaware, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint” (Docket No. 6), IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED and the Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE to Plaintiff filing an Amended Complaint that alleges facts sufficient to support all
of the elements of a claim for employment discrimination brought pursuant to Title VII. Plaintiff
shall file his Amended Complaint (if any) no later than November 28, 2011. If Plaintiff fails to file
an Amended Complaint by November 28, 2011, this action will be dismissed with prejudice.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ John R. Padova
John R. Padova, J.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
