GADLING-COLE v. WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY et al
Filing
41
ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS HEREBY GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEROME B. SIMANDLE ON 8/28/2013. 8/29/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CHARNETTA GADLING-COLE,
HON. JEROME B. SIMANDLE
Plaintiff,
Civil No. 11-0796 (JBS)
v.
ORDER
WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY, et
al.,
Defendants.
This matter having come before the Court1 upon the motion of
Defendants West Chester University, Eli DeHope, Claire Dente,
Janet Bradley, Rick Voss and Michele Belliveau (collectively,
"the Commonwealth Defendants") for summary judgment [Docket Item
30]; the Court having considered the submissions of the parties
and having heard oral argument; for the reasons explained in the
Opinion of today’s date; and for good cause shown;
IT IS this
28th
day of August, 2013 hereby
ORDERED that the Commonwealth Defendants' motion for summary
judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; and it is
ORDERED that summary judgment is DENIED as to Plaintiff's
claim against West Chester University for discrimination in the
hiring/promotion process under Title VII; and it is
1
The undersigned is Chief Judge of the U.S. District Court
for the District of New Jersey, sitting by designation pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 292(b).
ORDERED that summary judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's
claims against West Chester University for hostile work
environment, constructive discharge and retaliation under Title
VII and these claims are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and it
is
ORDERED that summary judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's
equal protection claim against Defendants Eli DeHope, Claire
Dente, Janet Bradley, Rick Voss and Michele Belliveau and this
claim is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and it is further
ORDERED that this case shall be set for trial.
s/ Jerome B. Simandle
JEROME B. SIMANDLE
Chief U.S. District Judge
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
