BOLDEN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
Filing
35
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IS GRANTED. THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT MUST BE FILED ON OR BEFORE 11/1/11. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 10/18/11. 10/19/11 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MARY BELINDA BOLDEN, Administratrix for
Shawn Lamont Bolden, Deceased,
Plaintiff,
v.
PENNSYLVANIA BUREAU OF PRISONS, and
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, CAPTAIN THOMAS
DOMAN, CAPTAIN J. JOHNSON, CAPTAIN
JEROME STRICKLAND, CAPTAIN WILLIAMS,
CORRECTIONS OFFICER BURTON,
CORRECTIONS OFFICER S. GREEN,
CORRECTIONS OFFICER VITO MANISCALO,
CORRECTIONS OFFICER PATRICIA
ROBINSON, CORRECTIONS OFFICER COMER
RUCKER, CORRECTIONS OFFICER SMITH,
CORRECTIONS [OFFICER] WALTERS, and
CORRECTIONS OFFICERS JOHN DOE 1-10,
individually and in their official capacities,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 11-0467
ORDER
AND NOW, this 18th day of October, 2011, upon consideration of the Motion to Dismiss filed by
Defendants Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Jerome Strickland, J. Johnson, Thomas Dohman, Vito
Maniscalo, “Burton,” Comer Rucker, Patricia Robinson, Captain Williams, Corrections Officer Smith, and
Corrections Officer S. Green (Docket No. 29); Plaintiff Mary Belinda Bolden’s Motion for Leave to File a
Second Amended Complaint (Docket No. 31); and Defendants’ Response in Opposition (Docket No. 33); it
is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint (Docket No. 31) is
GRANTED. The Second Amended Complaint must be filed on or before November 1,
2011.
2.
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 29) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
It is so ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Ronald L. Buckwalter
RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S.J.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
