LOHR v. KIMMEL & SILVERMAN, P.C. et al
Filing
70
ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF PLAINTIFF TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES IS GRANTED AND DENIED IN PART. THE CROSS MOTION OF DEFENDANT FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER IS GRANTED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH (1); ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 10/14/11. 10/14/11 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KRISTA V. LOHR
v.
KIMMEL & SILVERMAN, P.C.,
et al.
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 10-5857
ORDER
AND NOW, this 14th day of October, 2011, for the
reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby
ORDERED that:
(1)
the motion of plaintiff to compel discovery
responses (Doc. Nos. 60 and 61) is GRANTED to the extent that it
seeks a list of actions handled by the Massachusetts Kimmel &
Silverman office from May 2007 until the closing of the office;
(2)
the motion of plaintiff to compel is otherwise
DENIED; and
(3)
the cross motion of defendant for a protective
order (Doc. No. 66) is GRANTED except as provided in paragraph
(1).
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Harvey Bartle III
J.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
