BYRD v. COLLINS et al
Filing
16
ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ARE OVERRULED; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APROVED AND ADOPTED AS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED; THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; THE CLERK SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE STATISTICALLY.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 10/24/11. 10/26/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
GLEN BYRD
:
:
:
:
:
v.
ROBERT COLLINS, ET AL.
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 10-2702
ORDER
AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2011, upon careful and independent consideration of
the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and all attendant and
responsive briefing, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of Chief United States
Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter, and consideration of Petitioner’s “Written Objections to the
Report and Recommendation” (Docket No. 14), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1.
Petitioner’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED;
2.
The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED as set forth in the
accompanying Memorandum;
3.
The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED;
4.
There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability;
5.
The Clerk shall CLOSE this case statistically.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ John R. Padova
______________________
John R. Padova, J.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
