REESE et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al
Filing
52
ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ARE GRANTED. FORD'S REQUEST FOR FEES IS DENIED; AND JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFTS' FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FAULKNER-CIOCCA FORD MERCURY AND MAGARINE FORD-MERCUTY, INC. AND AGAINST PLFFS TIMOTHY K. REESE AND MARY K. REESE. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 10/3/11. ) 10/4/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(gn, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
TIMOTHY K. REESE & MARY K. REESE
:
CIVIL ACTION
:
NO. 09-2948
v.
:
:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY &
:
FAULKNER-CIOCCA FORD MERCURY
:
______________________________________________________________________________
TIMOTHY K. REESE & MARY K. REESE
v.
MAGARINO FORD-MERCURY, INC.
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 10-1181
ORDER
AND NOW, this 3rd day of October, 2011, in consideration of defendants’ motions for
summary judgment, Ford’s request for attorney fees and plaintiffs’ responses, it is ORDERED
that:
1)
Defendants’ motions for summary judgment are GRANTED;
2)
Ford’s request for fees is DENIED; and
3)
Judgment is entered in favor of defendants Ford Motor Company, FaulknerCiocca Ford Mercury and Magarino Ford-Mercury, Inc. and against plaintiffs
Timothy K. Reese and Mary K. Reese.
s/Thomas N. O’Neill, Jr.
THOMAS N. O’NEILL, JR., J.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
