SCHWARTZ et al v. LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Filing
93
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANT LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE COMPANYS MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT ONE OF THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 8/29/13. 8/30/13 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MITCHELL AND RANDI SCHWARTZ,
AND EDWARD AND MARY BURNSIDE on
behalf of themselves and all others similarly
situated,
CIVIL ACTION
NO.~
oq.,~y\
Plaintiffs,
v.
LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE
COMPANY,
,_
Defendant.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 29th day of August 2013, upon consideration of Defendant Lawyers
Title Insurance Company's Motion to Dismiss Count One of the Second Amended Complaint
(Doc. No. 67), Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition (Doc. 71), Defendant's Reply (Doc. 77), the
arguments of counsel for the parties at a hearing on the Motion held on February 15, 2013, and
the supplemental briefs filed by both parties (Doc. Nos. 84, 85), and for the reasons stated in the
Opinion of the Court issued this day, it is ORDERED as follows:
1.
Defendant Lawyers Title Insurance Company's Motion to Dismiss Count One of
the Second Amended Complaint is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
