SCHAFER v. DECISION ONE MORTGAGE COMPANY, LLC et al, No. 2:2008cv05653 - Document 24 (E.D. Pa. 2009)

Court Description: ORDERED THAT THE MOTION OF DEFENDANTS DECISION ONE AND HSBC TO DISMISS CIVIL COMPLAINT OF FRANCES L. SCHAFER (DOCKET NO. 2) IS GRANTED; THE MOTION OF DEFENDANT GREENWICH FINANCIAL PRODUCTS TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (DOCKET NO. 7) IS GRANT ED; THE MOTION OF PLAINTIFF TO REMAND THIS ACTION TO STATE COURT (DOCKET NO. 9) IS MOOT; AND THE MOTION OF DEFENDANTS DECISION ONE AND HSBC TO SEVER PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST GREENWICH CAPITAL FINANCIAL PRODUCTS, INC. OR ALTERNATIVELY TO DROP G REENWICH AS A PARTY DEFENDANT, PURSUANT TO RULE 21 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (DOCKET NO. 11) IS MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT IS INSTRUCTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE FOR ALL PURPOSES, INCLDING STATISTICS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 5/29/09. 5/29/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(rab)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA FRANCES L. SCHAFER Plaintiff, v. DECISION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION, et al. Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-5653 ORDER AND NOW, this 29th day of May, 2009, following briefing and an oral argument on April 3, 2009, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Motion of Defendants Decision One and HSBC to Dismiss Civil Complaint of Frances L. Schafer (Docket No. 2) is GRANTED; 2. The Motion of Defendant Greenwich Financial Products to Dismiss Plaintiff s Complaint (Docket No. 7) is GRANTED; 3. The Motion of Plaintiff to Remand this Action to State Court (Docket No. 9) is MOOT; and 4. The Motion of Defendants Decision One and HSBC to Sever Plaintiff s claims Against Greenwich Capital Financial Products, Inc. or Alternatively to Drop Greenwich as a Party Defendant, Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Docket No. 11) is MOOT. The Clerk of Court is instructed to CLOSE this case for all purposes, including statistics. BY THE COURT: S/Gene E.K. Pratter GENE E.K. PRATTER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.