SEGAL et al v. STRAUSSER ENTERPRISES, INC. et al, No. 2:2007cv04647 - Document 218 (E.D. Pa. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER THAT DEFENDANT LEONARD MELLON, ESQUIRE'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT'S OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS OR STAY IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT MELLON SHALL HAVE UNTIL 9/1/2011 TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 8/11/2011. 8/12/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(stwe, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
SEGAL et al v. STRAUSSER ENTERPRISES, INC. et al Doc. 218 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KENNETH SEGAL; ADAM SEGAL, as Trustee for and on Behalf of the Karen and Kenneth Segal Descendants Trust; and SEGAL AND MOREL, INC., Plaintiffs vs. STRAUSSER ENTERPRISES, INC.; GARY STRAUSSER; and LEONARD MELLON, Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 07-cv-04647 O R D E R NOW, this 11th day of August, 2011, upon consideration of the following documents: Defendant Leonard Mellon, Esquire’s Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s Opinion and Order on Motion to Dismiss or Stay, which motion for reconsideration was filed November 30, 2009 (Document 104), together with Defendant Leonard Mellon’s Memorandum in Support of Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s Opinion and Order on Motion to Dismiss, which memorandum was filed November 30, 2009 (Document 104-2); and Plaintiffs’ Opposition to the Motion of Defendant Leonard Mellon, Esquire’s Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s Opinion and Order on Motion to Dismiss or Stay, which opposition was filed December 11, 2009 (Document 107); after oral argument held January 13, 2010; and for the reasons articulated in the accompanying Opinion, Dockets.Justia.com IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Leonard Mellon, Esquire’s Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s Opinion and Order on Motion to Dismiss or Stay is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Leonard Mellon, Esquire shall have until on or before September 1, 2011 to answer plaintiffs’ Complaint. Failure to answer the Complaint on or before September 1, 2011 may result, upon proper application, in entry of default against defendant Mellon. BY THE COURT: /s/ James Knoll Gardner James Knoll Gardner United States District Judge -ii-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
