DOWDY v. FOLINO et al
Filing
38
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT TO 28 USC, SECTION 2254 IS DENIED; DOWDY'S REQUEST FOR AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING IS DENIED; AND THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 8/2/13. 8/2/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JAYHEEM TYEON DOWDY
v.
LOUIS FOLINO, et al.
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
No. 07-1160
ORDER
AND NOW, this 2nd day of August, 2013, upon careful and independent consideration of
Petitioner Jayheem Tyeon Dowdy’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
Thomas J. Rueter, to which no objections have been filed,1 it is ORDERED:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is
DENIED;
3. Dowdy’s request for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED; and
4. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.
The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Juan R. Sánchez
Juan R. Sánchez, J.
1
s
The Report and Recommendation was entered and mailed to the parties on June 20, 2013.
Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72.1 IV(b), a party may object to a magistrate judge’s report
“within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy thereof.” As of today’s date, no
objections have been filed.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
