APOTEX, INC. v. CEPHALON, INC. et al, No. 2:2006cv02768 - Document 1165 (E.D. Pa. 2017)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS IN LIMINE NOS. 1-10 (DOC. NO. 963 ), ARE DENIED IN PART AND GRANTED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 5/31/2017. 5/31/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(amas)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA __________________________________________ ___________________________________ : APOTEX, INC., : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, : : v. : No. 2:06-cv-2768 : CEPHALON, INC., et al., : Defendants. : __________________________________________:___________________________________ : GIANT EAGLE, INC., : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, : : v. : No. 2:10-cv-5164 : CEPHALON, INC., et al., : Defendants. : __________________________________________:___________________________________ : WALGREEN CO., et al., : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiffs, : : v. : No. 2:09-cv-3956 : CEPHALON, INC., et al., : Defendants. : __________________________________________:___________________________________ : RITE AID CORPORATION, et al., : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiffs, : : v. : No. 2:09-cv-3820 : CEPHALON, INC., et al., : Defendants. : __________________________________________:___________________________________ 1 ORDER AND NOW, this 31st day of May, 2017, upon consideration of the “Plaintiffs’ Motions in Limine Nos. 1-10” (Dkt. No. 06-2768, Doc. No. 963), it is hereby ORDERED that the motions are DENIED in part and GRANTED in part as follows: Motion in Limine Number 1 is DENIED; Motion in Limine Number 2 is GRANTED; Motion in Limine Number 3 is GRANTED; Motion in Limine Number 4 is DENIED without prejudice; Motion in Limine Number 5 is GRANTED; Motion in Limine Number 6 is DENIED; Motion in Limine Number 7 is DENIED without prejudice; Motion in Limine Number 8 is DENIED without prejudice; Motion in Limine Number 9 is DENIED without prejudice; and Motion in Limine Number 10 is DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Mitchell S. Goldberg ______________________________ Mitchell S. Goldberg, J. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.