APOTEX, INC. v. CEPHALON, INC. et al, No. 2:2006cv02768 - Document 1136 (E.D. Pa. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO EXCLUDE DAMAGES TESTIMONY OF PLAINTIFF APOTEX, INC.'S EXPERT DR. HAL SINGER, IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THE MOTION IS GRANTED SUCH THAT DR. SINGER'S DAMAGES CALCULATIONS 2 AND 3 ARE EXCLUDED. THE MOTION IS DENIED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 5/18/2017. 5/19/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(amas)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA __________________________________________ : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : CEPHALON, INC., et al., : Defendants. : __________________________________________: APOTEX, INC., CIVIL ACTION No. 2:06-cv-2768 ORDER AND NOW, this 18th day of May, 2017, upon consideration of “Defendants’ Joint Motion to Exclude Damages Testimony of Plaintiff Apotex, Inc.’s Expert Dr. Hal Singer” (Doc. No. 681), the response and reply thereto, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion is granted such that Dr. Singer’s damages calculations 2 and 3 are excluded. The motion is denied in all other respects. BY THE COURT: /s/ Mitchell S. Goldberg _____________________ Mitchell S. Goldberg, J.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
