JACKSON v. ROHM & HAAS COMPANY et al, No. 2:2005cv04988 - Document 247 (E.D. Pa. 2009)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER THAT THE 12/16/08 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANGELL (DOC #23) IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED IN PART. PLFF'S OBJECTIONS (DOC #234) ARE OVERRULED. THE ROHM & HAAS DEFTS' MOTION TO DISMISS THE CONSOLIDATED AMENDE D COMPLAINT (DOC #170) AND THE LIBERTY LIFE DEFTS' MOTION TO DISMISS THE CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC #171) ARE GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, ETC. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE LOUIS H. POLLAK ON 3/19/09. ) (Attachments: # 1 order) 3/20/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED.(gn, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MARK JACKSON, Civil Action No. 05-4988 Plaintiff, v. ROHM & HAAS COMPANY, et al., Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 19th day of March, 2009, after review of the Report and Recommendation of Judge M. Faith Angell and the responses of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The December 16, 2008 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Angell (Docket No. 230) is APPROVED and ADOPTED IN PART. 2. Plaintiff s Objections (Docket No. 234) are OVERRULED. 3. The Rohm & Haas Defendants Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint (Docket No. 170) and the Liberty Life Defendants Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint (Docket No. 171) are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART: a. Counts I - XV of the Consolidated Amended Complaint (CAC) (Docket No. 168) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; b. Counts XVII and XIX of the CAC are DISMISSED as to defendants Raj Gupta, Robert Lonergan, and Ellen Friedell; 1. c. Counts XX - XXV of the CAC are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 4. Plaintiff will be permitted to file a second consolidated amended complaint that pleads any of the remaining claims from the CAC that he elects to pursue; this amended complaint is to be filed by April 6, 2009. 5. On or before April 27, 2009, defendants are to file responses to this second CAC. 6. Pursuant to the court s Memorandum/Order of Sept. 12, 2007 (Docket No. 125), 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(c), and the Opinion and Order of this court dated March 19, 2009 denying plaintiff s motion to vacate the reference, this case remains assigned to Magistrate Judge M. Faith Angell. BY THE COURT: /s/ Louis H. Pollak, J. Pollak, J. 2.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
