Williams v. Premo, No. 6:2015cv00784 - Document 27 (D. Or. 2016)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, Magistrate Judge Clarke's Findings and Recommendation 21 is adopted in its entirety. Plaintiffs Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2 and Plaintiffs Motion for a Preliminary Injunction 8 are DENIED as moot and for failure to prosecute. Signed on 7/27/2016 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (copy mailed to plaintiff) (kms)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Williams v. Premo Doc. 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON CLINT WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, Civ. No. 6:15-cv-00784-CL v. OPINION and ORDER JEFF PREMO (Superintendent), Defendant. MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 21) and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(l)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Although neither party filed objections, I reviewed the legal principles de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude it is correct. 1 - OPINION AND ORDER Dockets.Justia.com THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, Magistrate Judge Clarke's Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 21) is adopted in its entirety. Plaintiffs Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 2) and Plaintiffs Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 8) are DENIED as moot and for failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 27th day of July, 2016. \ L-- Michael J. McShane United States District Judge 2 - OPINION AND ORDER
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
