Allen v. T Mobile et al, No. 6:2014cv01206 - Document 9 (D. Or. 2014)
Court Description: Opinion and Order: This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Ordered by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Allen v. T Mobile et al Doc. 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EARL DEAN ALLEN, Plaintiff, Civ. No. 6:14-cv-01206-MC OPINION AND ORDER V. T MOBILE, ATT, andVerizon, Defendants. MCSHANE, Judge: Plaintiff, prose, filed a complaint against T-Mobile, AT&T, and Verizon'on July 28, 2014. Pl.'s Compl. 1-5, ECF No. 1. On August 1, 2014, this Court issued an opinion dismissing plaintiffs complaint for failure to state a claim. Order 1-3, ECF No. 6. In consideration of plaintiffs pro se status, this Court granted plaintiff until September 2, 2014 "to file an amended complaint the deficiencies identified." ld. at 3. 1 not taken additional action since that time. Accordingly, because plaintiff failed to comply with this Court's order, ECF No. 6, this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 5th day of September, 2014. l_ยทยท Michael J. McShane United States District 1 The copy of this order (ECF No.6) sent to plaintiff was returned as "not deliverable as addressed." Mail Returned, ECF No. 8; see also Local Rule 83-10 ("[E]very unrepresented party[] has a continuing responsibility to notify the Clerk's Office whenever his or her mailing address, telephone number, and/or business e-mail address changes.''), 1 - OPINION AND ORDER Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
