Lock v. State of California et al, No. 6:2013cv02091 - Document 14 (D. Or. 2014)
Court Description: Opinion and Order: Plaintiff failed to comply with this Court's order 10 , this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed on 2/25/2014 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Lock v. State of California et al Doc. 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON DENNIS LOCK, Plaintiff, Civ. No. 6:13-cv-02091-MC v. OPINION AND ORDER STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. _____________________________ MCSHANE, Judge: Plaintiff, pro se, filed multiple documents in this action, including: (1) a complaint, ECF No. 2; (2) a petition for writ of mandamus, ECF No. 6; (3) a motion for temporary restraining order, ECF No. 7; and (4) a motion for notice of treason, ECF No. 8. This Court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint and denied plaintiff’s motions. In consideration of plaintiff’s pro se status, this Court granted plaintiff until February 5, 2014 to “file an amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified” in the order. Order, Jan. 6, 2014, ECF No. 10. Plaintiff has not taken additional action since that time. Accordingly, because plaintiff failed to comply with this Court’s order, ECF No. 10, this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 25th day of February, 2014. _______s/ Michael J. McShane Michael J. McShane United States District Judge 1 – OPINION AND ORDER Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
