Lock v. U.S. Attorney et al, No. 6:2013cv02069 - Document 8 (D. Or. 2014)
Court Description: Opinion and Order: This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Ordered by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Lock v. U.S. Attorney et al Doc. 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON . DENNIS LOCK, Petitioner, Civ. No. 6:13-cv-2069-MC v. OPINION AND ORDER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, et al., Respondents . . MCSHANE, Judge: Petitioner, prose, filed a petition for writ of mandamus (#2) on November 19,2013. Pet. Writ ofMaridamus, ECF No.2. On November 27, 2013, this Court issued an opinion denying petitioner's request. Order, Nov. 27, 2013, ECF No. 5. In consideration of petitioner's prose status, this Court granted petitioner "until December 27, 2013 to file for appropriate relief, e.g., a claim under 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983." Id. Petitioner has not taken additional action since that time. 1 Accordingly, because petitioner failed to comply with this Court's order (#5), this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED. - DATED this 8th day of January, 2014. L Michael J. McShane United States District Judge . 1 Petitioner did file a separate action, 6: 13-cv"2091-MC, that is also before this Court. 1 -OPINION AND ORDER Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
