Mota v. Nooth
Filing
21
ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 17 . Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 is denied. Signed on 12/7/2011 by Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken. (lg)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
RAMON E. MOTA,
Petitioner,
Civil No. 11-645-TC
v.
ORDER
MARK NOOTH,
Respondent.
Magistrate Judge Coffm filed his Findings and Recommendation on November 15,
2011. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(J)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P.
neb).
No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual
findings de novo review. Lorin Com. y. Goto & Co .. Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir.
1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).
Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Coffin's Findings and
Recommendation.
~
Dated thiS1!!. day of December, 2011.
~vilDfdD
<
Ann Aiken, United States District Judge
Order -- Page 1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
