Hensley v. Nike et al, No. 3:2020cv00791 - Document 21 (D. Or. 2020)

Court Description: OPINION & ORDER: Adopting the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation 15 . Plaintiff's Motion for Change of Judge 14 is Denied. Signed on 7/10/20 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (gm) Modified on 7/10/2020 to correct judge's name in docket text. NEF regenerated to the parties. (gm)

Download PDF
Hensley v. Nike et al Doc. 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON LEANNE J. HENSLEY, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:20-cv-00791-JR OPINION AND ORDER NIKE, et. al., Defendants. MOSMAN, J., On June 8, 2020, Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo issued her Findings and Recommendation (“F&R”) [ECF 15] recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion for Change of Judge [ECF 14] should be denied. Plaintiff objected [ECF 19]. 1 DISCUSSION The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the court is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of 1 As of the writing of this Opinion and Order, Defendants have not appeared in this case. 1 – OPINION AND ORDER Dockets.Justia.com the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). CONCLUSION Upon review, I agree with Judge Russo’s recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R [15] in full. I DENY Plaintiff’s Motion for Change of Judge [14]. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 10 day of July, 2020. ____________________________ u) ffk4-J1UZ1t,, MICHAEL W. MOSMAN United States District Judge 2 – OPINION AND ORDER

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.