Lamb v. Ace Cash Express, Inc., No. 3:2012cv01160 - Document 53 (D. Or. 2014)
Court Description: OPINION & ORDER: Lamb shall produce to Ace her medical records with the noted portions unredacted no later than May 9, 2014. Signed on 5/6/14 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (gm)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON CINDY LAMB, Plaintiff, 3:12-CV-01160-PK v. OPINION AND ORDER ACE CASH EXPRESS, INC., Defendant. P APAK, Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff Cindy Lamb brings this action against defendant Ace Cash Express, Inc. ("Ace"), her former employer, alleging that Ace violated Oregon law when it terminated her employment after she disclosed confidential customer information to law enforcement in the process of repmiing possible child neglect. Page 1 - OPINION AND ORDER On April!, 2014, Ace requested via email that the court conduct an in camera inspection of Lamb's umedacted medical records to determine whether Lamb redacted the records in compliance with the court's instructions at the July 11, 2013 telephonic hearing. On May 1, 2014, Lamb provided the court with a copy of her umedacted medical records. After reviewing the unredacted medical records, I find that, consistent with my July 11, 2013 ruling, the following should be umedacted: (!)page 1, paragraph 6 under "AlP"; (2) page 2, last sentence of the third paragraph on the page; and (3) page 2, paragraph 4 under "assessment/plan." CONCLUSION In light of the foregoing, Lamb shall produce to Ace her medical records with the noted portions umedacted no later than May 9, 2014. Dated thisC::,-\"day of May, 2014. Honorable Paul Papak United States Magistrate Judge Page 2 - OPINION AND ORDER
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
