International Association of Sheet Metal Workers Local 16 et al v. Coquille Sheet Metal, Inc., No. 3:2010cv01429 - Document 26 (D. Or. 2011)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with Judge Hubels recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R 24 as my own opinion. Signed on 12/13/11 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 16, et al. Plaintiffs, No. 3:10-cv-01429-HU v. OPINION AND ORDER COQUILLE SHEET METAL, INC., Defendant. MOSMAN, J., On November 15, 2011, Magistrate Judge Hubel issued his Findings and Recommendation ( F&R ) [24] in the above-captioned case, recommending that plaintiffs amended motion for judgment [21] be granted in part and that judgment be entered against the defendant. No objections were filed. DISCUSSION The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified findings or recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the 1 OPINION AND ORDER court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Upon review, I agree with Judge Hubel s recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R [24] as my own opinion. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 13th day of December, 2011. /s/ Michael W. Mosman MICHAEL W. MOSMAN United States District Court 2 OPINION AND ORDER

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.