Gauteraux v. Northwest Rodeo Association Inc. et al, No. 3:2010cv01382 - Document 13 (D. Or. 2011)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, I GRANT defendants Motion to Dismiss 7 , I GRANT plaintiffs motion to dismiss defendants Amis and Shannon 10 to the extent it does not overlap with defendants Motion to Dismiss, and I DISMISS the case with prejudice as to defendants Amis and Shannon, and without prejudice as to defendant NRA. Signed on 3/21/2011 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)

Download PDF
Gauteraux v. Northwest Rodeo Association Inc. et al Doc. 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION RYDER GAUTERAUX , dba Outlaw Productions, Plaintiff, No. CV 10-1382-MO v. OPINION AND ORDER NORTHWEST RODEO ASSOCIATION Inc., dba Northwest Professional Rodeo Association, PAT SHANNON, and RANDY AMIS Defendants. MOSMAN, J., Defendants Northwest Rodeo Association Inc. and Randy Amis move to dismiss Plaintiff s First Amended Complaint ( FAC ) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (#7). Plaintiff also moves voluntarily to dismiss defendants Amis and Shannon as to Counts XI and XII of the FAC (#10). DISCUSSION Plaintiff fails to state a claim under federal law. Plaintiff s allegations of racketeering under 18 U.S.C. § 1962 ( RICO ) fall well short of the federal pleading standard. See Bell Atl. 1 OPINION AND ORDER Dockets.Justia.com Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007). Here, plaintiff s allegations are precisely the kind of formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action, without any adequately supportive facts, that the Supreme Court has held inadequate. Id. Therefore, plaintiff has not stated a claim under federal law, and this court does not have federal question jurisdiction over plaintiff s claim. Plaintiff s claims are not completely diverse, and therefore do not provide a predicate for federal diversity jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Plaintiff is an Oregon resident, and all of the defendants are located in Oregon. The FAC states that defendant Northwest Rodeo Association ( NRA ) is registered in the state of Washington, but also alleges that the location of NRA s Secretary office is Molalla, Oregon. (FAC ¶ 2.) Documents attached to plaintiff s complaint list the NRA s address in Fossil, OR. (Pl. s Compl. (#1) 1 2.) Therefore, plaintiff has not pled diversity, and this court has no jurisdiction over this case. See Hertz Corp. v. Friend, 559 U.S. ___, 130 S. Ct. 1181, 1192 95 (2010) (holding that corporate citizenship for diversity purposes is determined by the location of the company s nerve center ). CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, I GRANT defendants Motion to Dismiss (#7), I GRANT plaintiff s motion to dismiss defendants Amis and Shannon (#10) to the extent it does not overlap with defendants Motion to Dismiss, and I DISMISS the case with prejudice as to defendants Amis and Shannon, and without prejudice as to defendant NRA. Because plaintiff is proceeding pro se, I will allow him 14 days from the date of this opinion to amend his complaint to plead diversity jurisdiction as to NRA only. Specifically, plaintiff must allege that NRA s principal place of business is somewhere other than Oregon, and must plead plausible facts to 2 OPINION AND ORDER support that allegation.1 If plaintiff does not properly plead jurisdiction within 14 days, the complaint shall be dismissed with prejudice as to NRA as well. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 21st day of March, 2011. /s/ Michael W. Mosman MICHAEL W. MOSMAN United States District Court 1 I suspect this is unlikely, given that NRA s Secretary s office is in Molalla, and documents attached to plaintiff s complaint list the address of NRA in Fossil, Oregon. I currently see no indication that NRA s principal place of business is anywhere other than Oregon. If plaintiff alleges NRA s principal place of business to be in a state other than Oregon, and offers plausible facts to support that allegation, then the court will require very limited jurisdictional discovery to determine NRA s principal place of business. 3 OPINION AND ORDER

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.