Chanouzas et al v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
Filing
27
ORDER: Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and Recommendation (# 18 ) on July 1, 2009. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Plaintiffs' request for oral argument is denie d. None of the parties timely filed objections. This relieves me of my obligation to review Magistrate Judge Papak's factual findings de novo. See 28 U.S.c. § 636(b)(1)(C); Simpson v. Lear Astronics Corp., 77 F.3d 1170, 1174-7 5 (9th Cir. 1996). Any possible insufficiency of evidence as to the amount of attorneys fees in controversy has been cured. (# 25 ). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error. Accordingly, I adopt the Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Papak. Signed on November 3rd, 2009 by Judge James A. Redden. (eo)
<![CDATA[
F1lfD'09 1m 0317:19JSOC-{Jll'
IN T H E UNITED STATES DISTRICT C O U R T F O R T H E D I S T R I C T OF O R E G O N
J O H N C H A N O U Z A S and J U L I A N E CHANOUZAS,
CV. 0 9 - 4 6 9 P K
Plaintiffs,
ORDER
v. U.S. B A N K N A T I O N A L A S S O C I A T I O N , a federally c h a r t e r e d n a t i o n a l b a n k , a n d U.S. B A N C O R P , a Delaware corporation, Defendants.
R E D D E N , Judge: Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and Recommendation (#18) o n July I , 2009. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 6 3 6 ( b ) ( l ) ( B ) and Fed. R. Civ. P.
n ( b ) . Plaintiffs' request for oral argument is denied.
None o f the parties timely filed objections. This relieves me o f my obligation to review Magistrate Judge Papak's factual findings de novo. See 28 U . S . c . § 636(b)(1)(C); Simpson v.
OPINION A N D O R D E R - I
Lear Astronics Corp., 7 7 F . 3 d 1170, 1174-75 (9th Cir. 1996). A n y p o s s i b l e insufficiency o f
e v i d e n c e a s t o t h e a m o u n t o f a t t o r n e y s f e e s i n c o n t r o v e r s y h a s b e e n c u r e d . (# 2 5 ) . H a v i n g r e v i e w e d t h e l e g a l p r i n c i p l e s de n o v o , I find no e r r o r . A c c o r d i n g l y , I a d o p t t h e F i n d i n g s a n d R e c o m m e n d a t i o n o f M a g i s t r a t e J u d g e Papak. IT IS SO O R D E R E D . Dated this 3" d a y o f N o v e m b e r , 2009.
un~tates District Judge
J~~~n
~i?-.
OPINION A N D O R D E R - 2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
