De Chavez v. United Mortgage Services, Inc et al
Filing
65
ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 60 . Defendant Countrywide's Motion to Dismiss 24 and defendant Wells Fargo's Motion to Dismiss 27 are granted. Dismissal is without prejudice. Plaintiff is granted to file an Amended Complaint. The Amended Complaint must be filed by December 18, 2009. Signed on 12/1/09 by Judge Ancer L. Haggerty. (cib)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON CATALINA GUZMAN DE CHAVEZ, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.; KARINA YANEZ (aka KARINA ROHRlG and KARINA CASTRO); COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC.; COUNTRYWIDE BANK., FSB; AND WELLS FARGO BANK., N.A., Defendants. Civil No. 09-285-AC ORDER
HAGGERTY, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation [60] recommending that defendant Countrywide's Motion to Dismiss [24] and defendant Wells Fargo's Motion to Dismiss [27] be granted without prejudice and with leave to plaintiff to amend. No objections were filed to this Findings and Recommendation, and the case was referred to me. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 72(b). When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation of the Magistrate. Campbell v. United States District Court, 501 F.2d 196 (9th Cir. 1974).
1 -- ORDER
No clear error appears on the face of the record. This court adopts the Findings and Recommendation.
CONCLUSION Defendant Countrywide's Motion to Dismiss [24] and defendant Wells Fargo's Motion to Dismiss [27] are granted. Dismissal is without prejudice. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an Amended Complaint. The Amended Complaint must be filed by December 18, 2009. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 1 day of December, 2009.
/s/ Ancer L. Haggerty Ancer L. Haggerty United States District Judge
2 -- ORDER
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
