Naylor v. Heatherman
Filing
18
ORDER: - The Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation 16 is ADOPTED AS FOLLOWS: Plaintiff's Motion to Remand 6 is GRANTED and defendant's Motion for Intra-District Transfer 3 is DENIED as moot. Signed on 1/12/2009 by Chief Judge Ancer L. Haggerty. (See formal order, 2-pages) (ecp)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
KAREN NAYLOR, Trustee of the Randall J. Jenks and Lynis T. Jenks Bankruptcy Estate, United States Bankruptcy Court, Central District of California, case No. 04-16958, Plaintiff, v. PATRICIA HEATHERMAN, an Oregon resident, Defendant. Civil No. 08-1255-ST ORDER
HAGGERTY, Chief Judge: Magistrate Judge Stewart issued a Findings and Recommendation [16] in this action that recommended that the Motion to Remand [6] pending in this action should be GRANTED, and the pending Motion for Intra-District Transfer [3] should be DENIED as moot.
1 - ORDER
No objections were filed to this Findings and Recommendation, and the case was referred to me. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 72(b). When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation of the Magistrate. Campbell v. United States District Court, 501 F.2d 196 (9th Cir. 1974). No clear error appears on the face of the record. This court adopts the Findings and Recommendation in the manner described below. CONCLUSION The Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation [16] is ADOPTED AS FOLLOWS: Plaintiff's Motion to Remand [6] is GRANTED and defendant's Motion for Intra-District
Transfer [3] is DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 12 day of January, 2009.
/s/ Ancer L. Haggerty Ancer L. Haggerty United States District Judge
2 - ORDER
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
