Wentz v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Filing
27
ORDER: The Honorable Paul Papak, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on October 1, 2009. Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendation. When either party objects to any portion of a magistra te's Findings and Recommendation concerning a dispositive motion or prisoner petition, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) ; McDonnell Douglas Com. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). This court has, therefore, given de novo review of the rulings of Magistrate Judge Papak.This court ADOPTS the Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Papak dated October 1, 2009 in its entirety. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision is affirmed. Signed on November 3rd, 2009 by Judge Garr M. King. (eo)
<![CDATA[
FlLEll'09 NIN 04 !O:241JSOC-&p
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT C O U R T F O R THE DISTRICT OF OREGON D E B R A WENTZ, Plaintiff,
v.
) ) ) )
)
Civil Case No. 08-661-PK ORDER
) MICHAEL 1. ASTRUE, Commissioner o f ) Social S e c u r i t y , ) ) Defendant. )
----------- )
Tim W i l b o r n W i l b o r n L a w O f f i c e , P.C. P. O. Box 2768 Oregon City, Oregon 97045 Attorney for Plaintiff Kent S. Robinson Acting U n i t e d S t a t e s A t t o r n e y District o f O r e g o n A d r i a n L. B r o w n U.S. Attorney's Office 1000 SW Third Avenue, Suite 600 P o r t l a n d , Oregon 97204 Page 1 - O R D E R
Terrye Erin Shea Social S e c u r i t y A d m i n i s t r a t i o n Office o f G e n e r a l C o u n s e l 70 I Fifth Avenue, Suite 2900 MIS 90 I S e a t t l e , W a s h i n g t o n 98104 Attorneys for Defendant
K I N G , Judge: The Honorable Paul Papa!<, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on October I , 2009. Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendation. When either party objects to any portion o f a magistrate's Findings and Recommendation concerning a dispositive motion o r prisoner petition, the district court must make a de novo determination o f that portion o f the magistrate's report. 28 U.S.C. § 6 3 6 ( b ) ( I ) ; Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); McDonnell Douglas Com. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). This court has, therefore, given de novo review o f the rulings o f Magistrate Judge Papak. This court ADOPTS the Findings and Recommendation o f Magistrate Judge Papa!< dated October I, 2009 in its entirety. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision is affirmed. DATED this
3 ~ y o f N o v e m b e r , 2009.
GARRM.KING United States D i s t r i c t J u d g e
Page 2 - O R D E R
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
