Powell's Books, Inc. et al v. Myers et al, No. 3:2008cv00501 - Document 51 (D. Or. 2009)
Court Description: Judgment. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED as follows:(1) ORS 167.054 and 167.057, as interpreted by the court in its Opinion and Order, are not substantially overbroad under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution; (2) ORS 167.054 and 167.057, as interpreted by the court in its Opinion and Order, are not unconstitutionally vague under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United StatesConstitution; (3) ORS 167.054 and 167.057, as interpreted by the court in its Opinion and Order, are not facially invalid; (4) Plaintiffs' complaint is dismissed with prejudice, plaintiffs taking nothing thereby. Signed on 1/6/09 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls) (Entered: 01/07/2009)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Powell's Books, Inc. et al v. Myers et al Doc. 51 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON POWELL'S BOOKS, INC., et al., No. CV 08-501-MO Plaintiffs, JUDGMENT v. HARDY MYERS, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oregon, et al., Defendants. MOSMAN, J., The court having issued its December 12, 2008 Opinion and Order (#48), in which the court denied plaintiffs' Motion for Permanent Injunction and Declaration of Unconstitutionality, and the court hereby incorporating that Opinion and Order in this judgment, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED as follows: (1) ORS 167.054 and 167.057, as interpreted by the court in its Opinion and Order, are not substantially overbroad under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution; PAGE 1 - JUDGMENT Dockets.Justia.com (2) ORS 167.054 and 167.057, as interpreted by the court in its Opinion and Order, are not unconstitutionally vague under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution; (3) ORS 167.054 and 167.057, as interpreted by the court in its Opinion and Order, are not facially invalid; (4) Plaintiffs' complaint is dismissed with prejudice, plaintiffs taking nothing thereby. DATED this 6th day of January, 2009. /s/ Michael W. Mosman MICHAEL W. MOSMAN United States District Judge PAGE 2 - JUDGMENT
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
