Boudreau v. United States
Filing
6
ORDER: Finding as Moot Motion to Dismiss 2 ; Finding as Moot Motion to Dismiss 4 . This case is dismissed. Signed on 12/6/2011 by Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken. (lg)
<![CDATA[
Case 3:07-mc-09148
Document 4-1
Filed 12/02/11
Page 1 of 2
Page ID#: 46
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
PORTLAND DIVISION
CAROLYN BOUDREAU,
Misc. No. 3:07- 9148
Petitioner,
[Proposed]
v.
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
This case is a petition to quash three Internal Revenue Service summonses.
Respondent, the United States of America, has filed a second motion to dismiss this
case, arguing that the Court has already adjudicated a materially identical petition
to quash in Boudreau v. United States, No. 07-mc-7015-AA (ECF No.4, entered Feb.
8,2008). The United States also argues that the case is moot because the Internal
Revenue Service has already reached a final determination of the petitioner's tax
liability, so the information sought by the summonses is no longer necessary. The
petitioner does not oppose this motion.
\\
\\
Order Dismissing Case
Page 10f2
7747755.1
Case 3:07-mc-09148
Document 4-1
Filed 12/02/11
Page 2 of 2
Page ID#: 47
For the reasons set forth in the United States' Unopposed Motion to Dismiss
Case as Adjudicated and as Moot, and because that Motion is unopposed, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Respectfully presented this 2nd day of December, 2011.
JOHN A. DICICCO
Principal Acting Assistant Attorney General
/s/ Adam Strait
ADAM D. STRAIT
Mass. BBO No. 670484
KARl D. LARSON
Trial Attorneys, Tax Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 683
Washington, D.C. 20044-0683
Telephone: (202) 307-2135
Facsimile: (202) 307-0054
adam.d.strait@usdoj.gov
S. AMANDA MARSHALL
United States Attorney, District of Oregon
Of Counsel
Attorneys for the United States of America
Order Dismissing Case
Page 2of2
7747755.1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
