Sexton v. Cozner - Document 74

FlLED'09 ffC 2115()7lJSlC-(ip I N THE UNITED STATES D I S T R I C T COURT FOR THE D I S T R I C T OF OREGON MATTHEW RYAN SEXTON, 06-CV-209-AC ORDER Petitioner, v. MIKE COZNER, S u p e r i n t e n d e n t MacLaren Youth Correctional Facility Respondent. BROWN, J u d g e . M a g i s t r a t e J u d g e J o h n V. A c o s t a i s s u e d F i n d i n g s a n d Recommendation (#66) on September 11, 2009, in which he recommended the Court deny P e t i t i o n e r ' s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (#1). Petitioner filed timely Objections to the The m a t t e r i s now b e f o r e t h i s Findings and Recommendation (#71). Court pursuant t o 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) and Federal Rule of C i v i l Procedure 72 (b) . 1 - ORDER  When a n y p a r t y o b j e c t s t o a n y p o r t i o n o f t h e M a g i s t r a t e Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the d i s t r i c t court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1). See also United States v. Reyna- T a p i a , 3 2 8 F . 3 d 1 1 1 4 , 1 1 2 1 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 3 ) ( e n b a n e ) ; U n i t e d S t a t e s v . B e r n h a r d t , 8 4 0 F . 2 d 1 4 4 1 , 1 4 4 4 (9 th C i r . 1 9 8 8 ) . In his Objections, Petitioner merely reiterates arguments contained in his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and supporting documents. This Court has carefully considered P e t i t i o n e r ' s Objections and concludes they do not provide a basis to modify the Findings and Recommendation. The Court also has reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and does not find any error in the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation. CONCLUSION T h e C o u r t ADOPTS M a g i s t r a t e J u d g e A c o s t a ' s F i n d i n g s a n d R e c o m m e n d a t i o n ( # 6 6 ) , a n d DENIES P e t i t i o n e r ' s P e t i t i o n f o r W r i t of Habeas Corpus (#1). I T I S SO ORDERED. DATED t h i s 2l~ay o f December, 2009. ANNA J . BROWN United States District Judge 2 - ORDER