Ewald v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
46
ORDER: Magistrate Judge John Jelderks filed Findings and Recommendation (# 44 ) on November 24, 2008, in the above-entitled case. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. neb). No objections hav e been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Britt v. Simi ValleyUnified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Jelderks' Findings and Recommendation (# 44 ) dated November 24, 2008, in its entirety. Defendant's motion (# 41 ) for summary judgment is granted and this case is dismissed with prejudice. Signed on January 9, 2009 by Judge Robert E. Jones. (eo)
<![CDATA[
FILED'09 cTA~j 0916:19uSDC'ORP
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT C O U R T F O R THE DISTRICT OF OREGON D O U G L A S EWALD, Plaintiff,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. Douglas Ewald 309 S.W. Fourth Avenue P o r t l a n d , O R 97204 P l a i n t i f f Pro S e Neil J. Evans UNITED S T A T E S A T T O R N E Y ' S O F F I C E 1000 S.W. Third Avenue, Suite 600 Portland, O R 9 7 2 0 4 - 2 9 0 2
L. J a m a l a E d w a r d s Social Security Administration O f f i c e o f t h e General C o u n s e l 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2900, MIS 901 Seattle, W A 9 8 1 0 4 - 7 0 7 5
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Civil No. 03-1274-JE ORDER
Attorneys for Defendant
JONES, Judge: Magistrate Judge John Jelderks filed Findings and Recommendation (#44) on November 24, 2008, in the above-entitled case. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P.
neb).
No objections have been timely filed. This
relieves me o f my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Jelderks' Findings and Recommendation (#44) dated ovember 24, 2008, in its entirety. Defendant's motion (#41) for summary judgment is
granted and this case is dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this
crt-
d a y o f January, 2 0 0 9 .
ONES es D i s t r i c t J u d g e
2 - ORDER
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
