James v. Mills, No. 1:2010cv00202 - Document 22 (D. Or. 2010)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: Denying Motion to Dismiss 17 ; Adopting Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation 20 . This case is stayed and a status check is set for 12/27/2011. Signed on 12/27/2010 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (dkj) Modified on 12/27/2010 to add opinion verbiage (dkj).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
James v. Mills Doc. 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON ALLEN LAMONT JAMES, Petitioner, v. Civ. No. 10-202-CL OPINION AND ORDER DON MILLS, Respondent. PANNER, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the:natter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636 (b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983). I conclude that the Rand R is correct. Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#20) adopted. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice (#17) is is 1 - ORDER Dockets.Justia.com DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter an order staying this proceeding and setting a case status check one year from the date of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this ~~ jay of December, 2010. OWEN M. PANNER U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 2 - ORDER
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
