Chetco River Resort, LLC et al v. Podesta-Daniels et al
Filing
29
ORDER: Granting Motion to Dismiss without prejudice but with costs and attorneys fees to defendants 26 . Please access document by number hyperlink for complete review of order. Signed on 11/30/2009 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (jw)
FILED"09 DEC 0117:22USDC'OPt
o ;
IN T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S D I S T R I C T C O U R T D I S T R I C T OF O R E G O N
C H E T C O R I V E R R E S O R T , LLC, an O r e g o n l i m i t e d l i a b i l i t y c o m p a n y ; W H I T E R O C K R E S O R T , LLC, a California limited liability company; and R V R E N T A L S E R V I C E S , INC., a California corporation, Plaintiffs,
v.
KEN PODESTA-DANIELS, LAURIE PODESTA-DANIELS, and S T A C E Y MILLER, Defendants.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
C a s e No. C V 0 9 - 3 0 6 4 - P A
ORDER
The C o u r t h e a r d the a r g u m e n t s in connection w i t h Plaintiffs' m o t i o n to dismiss the a c t i o n w i t h o u t p r e j u d i c e b y t e l e p h o n e o n N o v e m b e r 23, 2 0 0 9 . D e f e n d a n t s s t i p u l a t e d that the m a t t e r could b e d i s m i s s e d w i t h o u t prejudice b u t w i t h costs a n d attorneys fees to the defendants. P l a i n t i f f s filed t h i s a c t i o n k n o w i n g o f the e x i s t e n c e o f t h e s t a t e c o u r t l i t i g a t i o n i n v o l v i n g t h e s a m e m a t t e r i n C a l i f o r n i a a n d n o w c o n t e n d t h e y h a v e l i m i t e d a s s e t s t o l i t i g a t e b o t h cases. The C o u r t grants t h e plaintiffs' m o t i o n to dismiss w i t h o u t prejudice [# 26 ] but with costs
I - ORDER
and attorneys fees to defendants.
Defendant is cautioned not to include any attorney
fees expenses connected with this case that might be helpful to defendant i n the California case. D A T E D this
9t?
d a y o f N o v e m b e r , 2009.
OWEN M. P A N N E R U.S. District Judge
~?fffli:r~~
1 - ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?