Sexton v. Nooth, No. 1:2009cv00727 - Document 21 (D. Or. 2010)
Court Description: Opinion and Order Adopting Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report & Recommendation 19 . The petition 1 is denied and this action is dismissed. Signed on 12/9/2010 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (dkj)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Sexton v. Nooth Doc. 21 FI Lt~.Jj1 J.:..,,' C.) _·,f'I_!:".·. (' ¢. -'- c'..:., 1 ..' ",l.i; ",c,,' . ,-j' '"1j J'r. -r.,-. ''-t.J:_~lh_·-;_r:.I·l IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MICHAEL CRAIG SEXTON, Petitioner, Civ. No. 09-727-CL OPINION AND ORDER v. MARK NOOTH, Respondent. PANNER, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation (IJR and R IJ ), and the matter court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B), lS now before this Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983). I conclude that the Rand R is correct. - ORDER Dockets.Justia.com CONCLUSION Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#19) adopted. The petition (#1) is denied and this action is dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this day of December, 2010. a;g17H~ OWEN M. PANNER U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE - ORDER lS
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
