Morey v. Social Security Administration
Filing
20
ORDER: Adopting Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation 16 . The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed. Signed on 1/14/09 by Judge Owen M. Panner. (mkk)
<![CDATA[
FIl&09 ,JAN 1416:13JSoc-(RP
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON NANCY MOREY, C i v . No. 0 7 - 3 0 9 5 - C L Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J . ASTRUE, C o m m i s s i o n e r , Social Security Administration, Defendant.
PANNER, D i s t r i c t J u d g e : ORDER
M a g i s t r a t e J u d g e M a r k D. C l a r k e f i l e d a R e p o r t a n d R e c o m m e n d a t i o n , a n d t h e m a t t e r i s now b e f o r e t h i s c o u r t . U.S.C.
§
S e e 28
6 3 6 ( b ) (1) ( B ) , F e d . R. C i v . P . 7 2 ( b ) .
Plaintiff has
filed objections. review. 28 U . S . C .
I have given the f i l e of t h i s case de novo
§
6 3 6 ( b ) (1)
(C)i
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v.
Commodore B u s . Mach . · I n c . , 6 5 6 F . 2 d 1 3 0 9 , 1 3 1 3 ( 9 t h C i r . 1 9 8 1 ) . Plaintiff objects, arguing that the hypothetical question s u b m i t t e d t o t h e v o c a t i o n a l e x p e r t i m p r o p e r l y o m i t t e d some o f plaintiff's limitations. I agree with Judge Clarke that the
A L J ' s f a i l u r e t o i n c l u d e l i m i t a t i o n s i n memory a n d c o n c e n t r a t i o n 1ORDER
was h a r m l e s s b e c a u s e t h e ALJ d i d i n c l u d e t h e l i m i t a t i o n o f n o detailed tasks or instructions, and the vocational expert t e s t i f i e d that the jobs she identified could be performed by a p e r s o n w i t h m o d e r a t e l i m i t a t i o n s i n u n d e r s t a n d i n g , memory, a n d concentration. I find no error in the Report and Recommendation.
CONCLUSION
M a g i s t r a t e Judge C l a r k e ' s Report and Recommendation (#16) i s adopted. The d e c i s i o n o f t h e Commissioner i s a f f i r m e d .
I T I S SO ORDERED. DATED t h i s
It/- day
of January, 2009.
OWEN M. PANNER U . S . DISTRICT JUDGE
~&~~
/}
f/;)
2 - ORDER
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
