1963 District of Oregon US Federal District Court Case Law

Renken v. Harvey Aluminum (Incorporated)
Date: December 23, 1963
Citation: 226 F. Supp. 169
Docket Number: 61-207
Mitchell Bros. Truck Lines v. United States
Date: December 20, 1963
Citation: 225 F. Supp. 755
Docket Number: 63-215
Martin v. Reynolds Metals Company
Date: December 11, 1963
Citation: 224 F. Supp. 978
Docket Number: 61-545
United States v. Harder Industrial Contractors, Inc.
Date: November 27, 1963
Citation: 225 F. Supp. 699
Docket Number: 63-51
Hiersche v. Seamless Rubber Co.
Date: November 21, 1963
Citation: 225 F. Supp. 682
Docket Number: 63-219
Scott v. United States
Date: November 1, 1963
Citation: 225 F. Supp. 257
Docket Number: 62-366
United States v. Rands
Date: October 16, 1963
Citation: 224 F. Supp. 305
Docket Number: 63-380
In Re Harvest Milling Company
Date: September 27, 1963
Citation: 221 F. Supp. 836
Docket Number: B-47145
Waterman Steamship Corporation v. Snow
Date: September 27, 1963
Citation: 222 F. Supp. 892
Docket Number: 62-153
Boyl v. California Chemical Company
Date: September 11, 1963
Citation: 221 F. Supp. 669
Docket Number: 62-240
United Pacific Ins. Co. v. First National Bank of Oregon
Date: August 29, 1963
Citation: 222 F. Supp. 243
Docket Number: 62-145
ST. IOANNIS SHIPPING CORPORATION v. Zidell Explorations, Inc.
Date: August 23, 1963
Citation: 222 F. Supp. 299
Docket Number: 61-537
Cornish v. United States
Date: July 16, 1963
Citation: 221 F. Supp. 658
Docket Numbers: 61-409, 61-415, 61-412
Barber v. Gladden
Date: May 24, 1963
Citation: 220 F. Supp. 308
Docket Number: 62-200
In Re Martin
Date: April 2, 1963
Citation: 217 F. Supp. 937
Docket Number: B-56828
City of Myrtle Point v. Pacific Indemnity Company
Date: March 29, 1963
Citation: 233 F. Supp. 193
Docket Number: 62-216
Petition of United States
Date: March 26, 1963
Citation: 216 F. Supp. 775
Docket Number: 62-23
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. Long
Date: January 17, 1963
Citation: 214 F. Supp. 307
Docket Number: 61-259

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.