Rice v. Just on Time Freight Systems, Inc. et al, No. 4:2016cv00524 - Document 32 (N.D. Okla. 2017)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frank H McCarthy ; denying 31 Motion to Quash (tjc, Dpty Clk)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Rice v. Just on Time Freight Systems, Inc. et al Doc. 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA RONNIE RICE, Plaintiff, v. JUST ON TIME FREIGHT SYSTEMS, INC., KENANI MAUTI OENDO, and BRYSON & ASSOCIATES, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 16-CV-524-GKF-FHM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum Issued by the Defendants, [Dkt. 31], is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1). If the parties are unable to resolve the issue after a good faith conference, Plaintiff may refile the motion specifically identifying the information claimed to be privileged or protected. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5)(A) IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of March, 2017. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
