Woodul v. Ozment, No. 4:2013cv00163 - Document 24 (N.D. Okla. 2013)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frank H McCarthy ; denying 21 Motion for Sanctions (tjc, Dpty Clk)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA DANIEL WOODUL, Plaintiff, v. ALDEN OZMENT, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 13-CV-163-JED-FHM OPINION AND ORDER Defendant s Motion for Sanctions [Dkt. No. 21] is before the court for decision. Plaintiff has filed a response [Dkt. No. 23]. No reply has been filed. Defendant s motion seeks sanctions for Plaintiff s alleged failure to comply with the court s order granting Defendant s Motion to Compel [Dkt. No. 16]. After the Motion to Compel was granted this case was dismissed. Plaintiff subsequently filed a state court case and agreed to produce the information ordered produced by this court in the state case. Based upon these facts this court finds that sanctions are not warranted. Defendant s Motion for Sanctions [Dkt. No. 21] is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of November, 2013.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
